<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Terriable spelling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/2008/09/02/terriable-spelling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/2008/09/02/terriable-spelling/</link>
	<description>Enoch Lau's Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Enoch Lau</title>
		<link>http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/2008/09/02/terriable-spelling/comment-page-1/#comment-23636</link>
		<dc:creator>Enoch Lau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 10:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/?p=263#comment-23636</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comment, and I'm glad to hear that you care about continually improving your systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment, and I&#8217;m glad to hear that you care about continually improving your systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/2008/09/02/terriable-spelling/comment-page-1/#comment-23405</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/?p=263#comment-23405</guid>
		<description>You will be happy to know this has now been fixed. 

The rating function was made by web developers not editors. Obviously a lot of developers lack the copy proofing standards that writers and editors adhere to .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will be happy to know this has now been fixed. </p>
<p>The rating function was made by web developers not editors. Obviously a lot of developers lack the copy proofing standards that writers and editors adhere to .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enoch Lau</title>
		<link>http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/2008/09/02/terriable-spelling/comment-page-1/#comment-15075</link>
		<dc:creator>Enoch Lau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 13:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/?p=263#comment-15075</guid>
		<description>I haven't been reading the actual paper, just the online version... I wonder if the copyediting has gone down on its print version as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t been reading the actual paper, just the online version&#8230; I wonder if the copyediting has gone down on its print version as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/2008/09/02/terriable-spelling/comment-page-1/#comment-11464</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/?p=263#comment-11464</guid>
		<description>Copy-proofing standards at the smh have been dropping and dropping -- even in headlines on the front page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Copy-proofing standards at the smh have been dropping and dropping &#8212; even in headlines on the front page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
