New law school at Sydney Uni

If you’ve ever been to the old law school build­ing in the city at St James, you’ll prob­ably agree that while it may have had great loc­a­tion, loc­a­tion, loc­a­tion, it was most def­in­itely a renovator’s choice find. Cock­roaches, tem­per­at­ure vari­ations never thought pos­sible on planet Earth and utterly-​​frustrating swivel chairs will thank­fully be a thing of the past (mostly any­way – some classes will still be taught at St James). So rejoice, and explore the new law build­ing with me.

Yes, UNSW has one, and now we too are blessed with a Free­hills Law Lib­rary. Com­pared with the law lib­rary of old, the Free­hills Law Lib­rary is a taste of heaven; the high ceil­ing and the gen­er­ous use of glass cre­ates a light, airy feel that con­trasts well with the old browns and greys. It’s also roomy; well-​​equipped meet­ing rooms are now aplenty.


Click on the thumb­nails to enlarge the images.

The SciTech Lib­rary – not far away – set rather high stand­ards and it was always going to be hard to beat; the law lib­rary is a mod­ern lib­rary with mod­ern facil­it­ies, but frankly, it doesn’t exude quite the same vibe. Although there are rare splashes of col­our, it comes across as some­what sub­dued (per­haps well suited for law?). And that thing stick­ing out of the ground next to the Fisher stack? It is, in fact, the top part of the centrepiece of the lib­rary, a column of light befit­ting the grand­est of pub­lic libraries.



It’s sur­pris­ing how much of the law school is under­ground. The lib­rary is mostly under­ground, and apart from the small sec­tion adja­cent to the East­ern Avenue com­plex, most of the teach­ing space is also under­ground. Unfor­tu­nately, it wasn’t pos­sible for me to look inside the new sem­inar rooms, but I can say that the cor­ridors were spa­cious, allow­ing for an effi­cient flow of traffic.

Teaching spaceTeaching space

Let’s step out­side for a moment. On the left-​​hand side, you can see the top part of the library’s column of light. The above-​​ground levels of the law school have, just inside of the glassy exter­ior, angled wooden pan­els, or per­haps large wooden blinds. I must say that the extens­ive use of wood as a dec­or­at­ive fea­ture in such a mod­ern build­ing does seem a little out of place to me. One inter­est­ing fea­ture is the plaza under­neath the build­ing that slopes towards Vic­toria Park; the idea is to con­nect the uni­ver­sity to the rest of the city.

Law School, with Fisher Library to the leftPlaza leading to Victoria ParkStudents walking to Law School

The above-​​ground levels also make good use of nat­ural light. Stu­dent admin­is­tra­tion is con­veni­ently loc­ated one level above ground, and the use of the bridge between the two halves of the build­ing as a com­mon meet­ing space should prove to be a pop­u­lar idea.

Student administrationSeating inside the bridgeThe old, from the new

There’s little doubt that the new law school is an improve­ment on the old, in terms of the facil­it­ies for staff and stu­dents. Aes­thet­ic­ally though, I was some­what taken aback by the lack of warmth on dis­play, the dis­cord­ance of the wood along­side the glass and the bizarre oracle that is the above-​​surface por­tion of the library’s column of light. At the very least, we have premier teach­ing facil­it­ies befit­ting a premier law school.

More pho­tos here.

Related posts:

  1. Law school in hot water
  2. Green­ery at old law school
  3. Law puzz­lers
  4. GPlates
  5. UNSW JD and new city campus

Tags: , , , ,

  1. Brendan’s avatar

    Aaaah, I should’ve checked out the law build­ing yes­ter­day when I was on cam­pus, but… I didn’t.

    Any­way, looks kinda snazzy, but here’s what con­fuses me about that lib­rary, and the Scitech lib­rary too: What’s with the shoulder-​​height book­shelves? I mean, sure, I sup­pose they allow light and the appear­ance of spa­cious­ness and what­not, but I would’ve thought that the primary pur­pose of a lib­rary should be just mak­ing as much space for books as pos­sible, espe­cially when the books area and the read­ing area are nicely seperated.

    The short shelves just strike me as a bit of a under­use of space, and end up look­ing kinda weird when you have such a high roof any­way. I mean, I’m prob­ably biased here by the com­plaints of cer­tain maths stu­dents, who found most of their books end­ing up in Stor­age after the move to Scitech, when some slightly taller book­cases might’ve been able to acco­mod­ate at least some of them… But this does seem to me to be some­what con­trary to the point of a… Library.

    Any­way, I’m done with that rant, thanks for the update.

    Reply

  2. Ris’s avatar

    I had the same feel­ing about the shoulder-​​height book­shelves. But its a very sexy look­ing build­ing. I like the view over the “gar­dens” to the old build­ings as well. We need more meet­ing rooms over at UNSW :(

    Reply

    1. Enoch Lau’s avatar

      Thank­fully we got the idea of a lib­rary more than UNSW did; when they moved into their new law build­ing, their lib­rary was smal­ler than the old one and they threw out large chunks of their col­lec­tion. In this new lib­rary, there are plenty of empty shelves just wait­ing to be filled.

      I read some­where that it’s for access­ib­il­ity pur­poses. People in wheel­chairs can’t reach high book­shelves. I sus­pect that they keep the high traffic stuff in low book­shelves, the more eso­teric stuff in nor­mal high book­shelves, and the stuff that would be touched once in a cen­tury go into the compactors.

      Reply

    2. alison Giles’s avatar

      Ris, what is it that makes it look sexy?

      Reply

  3. Eric’s avatar

    Rendered con­crete ceil­ings, col­our­less walls, a ridicu­lous center­piece in the form of a giant sky­light that serves as the primary source of light for the 8 people that can actu­ally fit in the read­ing room and the simply ridicu­lous fur­nish­ings are all a part of the unfor­tu­nate trend towards min­im­al­ist design that is mak­ing its way through Usyd.

    The new law build­ings, as well as the SciTech building/​library, are no doubt part of the future of Usyd but pale in com­par­ison to Man­ning, the Edu­ca­tion Build­ing and the newly ren­ov­ated John Wool­ley build­ing; all of which are rel­at­ively new build­ings that man­age to incor­por­ate the character.

    Per­haps when Carslaw is torn down, it can be replaced by some­thing more sub­stant­ive than glass, bare walls and uncom­fort­able furniture.

    Reply

    1. Enoch Lau’s avatar

      Frankly, I think the Edu­ca­tion Build­ing is one of worst mod­ern build­ings on main cam­pus. An interior befit­ting of a hos­pital, the Edu­ca­tion Build­ing some­how man­ages to import the nar­row cor­ridors and dimly lit stair­wells of the old without car­ry­ing any of the charm of the gothic-​​architecture build­ings around cam­pus. It’s only about 15 years old, but already it feels bey­ond its prime – a withered flower.

      In denoun­cing min­im­al­ism (or stain­less steel and glass build­ings as a proxy), you fail to recog­nise that min­im­al­ism can be an end in itself; there are those who strive for it. Each period of devel­op­ment has made its unique mark upon the uni­ver­sity, and this period is no different.

      Reply

  4. Tommy Chen’s avatar

    When the University’s found­ing fath­ers chose the design for the Great Hall, they were build­ing for the gen­er­a­tions. They saw noth­ing wrong in choos­ing a design the size and opu­lence of which hardly befit­ted the tiny insti­tu­tion that the Uni­ver­sity was at the time. Yet today, their pres­ci­ence is proved at every one of the hun­dreds of cere­mon­ies that take place in the hall, a venue befit­ting one of the grand­est bas­tions of learn­ing in this country.

    Unfor­tu­nately, the modern-​​day cor­por­ate suits and doped-​​up artists who run the uni­ver­sity don’t think like that any­more. So we have a build­ing that’s hardly a build­ing. Yes, it does a won­der­ful job of blend­ing in – blend­ing into the ground, blend­ing into East­ern Avenue, blend­ing in to the blind­ing white desert of East­ern Avenue. But is that what a law school should look like? Does this mish-​​mash of dun­geons and glass pan­els look like the incub­ator for the future defend­ers of our liberty?

    This design would be great for some­thing use­ful but slightly dis­taste­ful. The organic waste incin­er­ator, per­haps. The Office of the Uni­ver­sity Inquis­it­ors. The Chan­cel­lory. The glass walls sym­bol­ise trans­par­ency, see, while the armies of bean coun­ters are chained to their deks downstairs.

    Reply

  5. Tommy Chen’s avatar

    (con­tin­ued)

    You see, I’ve seen big con­crete blobs like this, and I know what is meant by a “grand entrance” that “blends” the “space” into the “external space” , espe­cially when the said entrance con­sists of con­crete. It will get dirty, it will get stained. It will start crack­ing, and bums will piss/​sleep/​vomit all over it. Nobody walks up Vic­toria Park to get to Sydney Uni; at least, not from the law school dir­ec­tion. It will become des­ol­ate, it will be a wind tun­nel in winter and a glar­ing pool of heat­stroke in summer.

    Tried and true forms like cloisters, and indeed, doors, and ground floors, and build­ing above the ground, have stood the test of time because they work. Plant­ing trees along the side of a road is *not* just an imper­i­al­istic impos­i­tion of oppress­ive order on the nat­ive land.

    My ver­dict: inter­est­ing, but too avant garde for its own good.

    Reply

    1. Enoch Lau’s avatar

      I would have to agree that it is lam­ent­able that at the moment, we don’t seem to have a thing in NSW, or indeed in Aus­tralia, of hav­ing pub­lic buildings/​spaces as impress­ive monu­ments. A great insti­tu­tion as the Uni­ver­sity of Sydney deserves its Great Hall and its Quad­rangle, but there comes a point when the university’s goals – the edu­ca­tion of its stu­dents and the fur­ther­ance of use­ful fields of study – demand func­tional spaces that are fit for pur­pose. More or less, the new law school is fit for pur­pose. If you lament what got built, per­haps be thank­ful that we didn’t get some­thing like Carslaw or the Chem­istry Build­ing, two mon­stros­it­ies that were built in a hurry and with lim­ited funds.

      I agree with you that nobody sane would come into the uni via Vic­toria Park, but Daniel threw to me the idea that per­haps it serves the oppos­ite pur­pose – it’s there to let the cooped-​​up uni stu­dents out, into the green expanse of the Park.

      Frankly, new, com­fort­able facil­it­ies will do more to stim­u­late the minds of the future defend­ers of our liberty. What use is it when a bud­ding con­sti­tu­tional law­yer is dis­trac­ted by creak­ing chairs and suf­foc­ated by a lack of suit­able ventilation?

      Hav­ing explored more of the law school now, there are little things that annoy me – the lack of notice­boards, and the insuf­fi­ciency of seat­ing with power points in the lib­rary being two of them. Also, it shares – along with the Stu­dent Centre – dis­gust­ing pine pan­el­ling; pine is cheap wood that makes me think the entire place is still under con­struc­tion. God for­bid the day that stain­less steel and glass give way to stain­less steel, glass and pine.

      Reply

  6. Tommy Chen’s avatar

    Pine is ter­rible. Mahogany pan­el­ling or noth­ing, I say. I also agree that the Edu­ca­tion build­ling – along with the Man­ning exten­sion – are among the worst build­ings on cam­m­pus. They are mon­stros­it­ies: mod­ern build­ings that ‘echo’ their his­tor­ical sur­round­ings but make a farce of it. It would be great if they re-​​interpreted Gothic revival in abstract form. But stick­ing up cheap, chequered imit­a­tions of gables is just dis­t­gust­ing. I prefer chrome and glass over those piles of crap any day.

    You know what’s inter­est­ing? The little glass alcove in the upper wall of the lib­rary reminds me of the little grilled (with a grille – not cooked on a grill) alcoves in an Italian church – the idea is that young girls from the attached orphan­age would give violin per­form­ances there, and to dis­cour­age lust from the audi­ence, they stand in the grilled alcove so that audi­ence mem­bers can’t see their faces. That, at least, is the inten­tion. The res­ult is that the half-​​veiled glimpses only increased the mys­tery and allure.

    Hmm. Here’s a romance novel (a start)

    “Damn con­sti­tu­tional law, Chiqui thought, as he looked up from his books and around the law lib­rary; it’s ter­rible how we are made to study in this bunker of unfur­nished con­crete walls and cheap pine — the only patch of light is the glass alcove, high up one wall. His eyes glanced over it, but were quickly drawn back by a glimpse of some­thing red – the only bright col­ours in the room. A red scarf, a flick of long black hair — and she was gone.”

    Reply

  7. mish lan’s avatar

    WOW… didnt real­ise you guys were SO against it..

    i dis­agree on many points..
    will dis­cuss in per­son next time i see youse

    Reply

    1. Enoch Lau’s avatar

      Hmm yes we need to hear from someone who’s actu­ally stud­ied archi­tec­ture :)

      Reply