Sydney’s metro: a solution looking for a problem

If there’s one thing that I’ve taken away from my IT stud­ies, it’s this: even if you come up with a new, whiz­bang idea, ask your­self, what prob­lem does it solve?

Many innov­at­ive people are prob­ably hav­ing many innov­at­ive ideas right now, but do any of these ideas solve real prob­lems that people care about?

As an example, my pet peeve are those bar­codes on posters that you’re meant to scan with your mobile phone. Tel­stra seems to think they’re a great idea, but really, what prob­lem does it solve? Is it that I can’t get enough advert­ising in my day that I need to access pro­mo­tional crap even faster? It doesn’t even save me time, and it’s not easier either. I tried it on a bus once: nav­ig­at­ing the menus on my Nokia and try­ing to get the cam­era (which (un)helpfully zoomed in to tele­scopic depths) to focus on a little square on the ceil­ing above my head got me nowhere except for stares all round.

Any­way, back to the main point for today. Firstly, I’d say met­ros are good. I like met­ros. Nathan Rees likes met­ros too.

But what prob­lem does the Central-​​Rozelle metro solve?

Accord­ing to the Her­ald today, the first three stops are Cent­ral, Town Hall and Mar­tin Place. We already have a train line that allows you con­vey your­self between those very three points. Then it con­tin­ues on to Rozelle. What on earth is at Rozelle? The idea is, it would be seem, to make people alight from Vic­toria Road buses and fin­ish the bal­ance of their jour­ney on the metro. Yes, Vic­toria Road is a park­ing lot dur­ing peak hour, but does this metro solve the prob­lem? If people aren’t catch­ing the buses right now, there’s no indic­a­tion that more people will be inclined to catch buses that con­nect onto a metro. Look at the map your­self: Vic­toria Road is a night­mare because it’s the free altern­at­ive to the Lane Cove Tun­nel and the Har­bour Bridge, for people up north-​​western way (Ryde, etc).

Then there’s the Cent­ral end. The idea is to make people get off CityRail trains and force them to change onto the metro… which runs to Town Hall, Mar­tin Place and Wynyard. Apart from the fact that those sta­tions can already be reached by people get­ting off at Cent­ral, what prob­lem is the metro solv­ing? It’s a little crowded at times, but it works reas­on­ably well, and the gov­ern­ment must have been think­ing that they could arti­fi­cially engin­eer a prob­lem by mak­ing every­one get off. It’s not going to work.

Spend­ing $5bn for a pat­ron­age of 5,500 people is pathetic. But people will come if you solve their problems.

So what prob­lems are there that could be solved by a metro? Buses. Sydney Buses suck. Espe­cially the ones that run along George and Cast­lereigh Streets. If you stand along George Street dur­ing peak hour, every second vehicle going past you is a bus. The Wynyard bus ter­minal is also a night­mare; office work­ers queuing up for miles to get on buses destined for the north­ern beaches, along with the Great Wall of China, are the two man-​​made form­a­tions vis­ible from space.

I’ve had this drawn up for a while, but this is a metro line, if it were built, that I think would solve prob­lems:


Enlarge this map

With this metro, you would ter­min­ate Par­ra­matta Road and City Road buses before Broad­way. In this case, for­cing people off won’t irk any­one because the ride into the city is cur­rently tor­ture any­way. Like­wise, on the north­ern approach, ter­min­ate north­ern beaches buses before they hit the bridge. I’ve only paired two sta­tions with CityRail sta­tions – Cent­ral and Wynyard (I think Town Hall is bey­ond hope) – and moved city sta­tions closer together. They’re fur­ther apart than bus stops, but frankly, bus stops on every block as it cur­rently stands is a bit ridicu­lous. Com­bined with some light rail on the sur­face, which Clover seems more than happy to provide, this, I humbly sub­mit, is a metro that solves the CBD’s problems.

It’s not that I think a metro can’t be a good solu­tion, but as it stands, the Central-​​Rozelle metro gets Sydney nowhere.

Related posts:

  1. Sydney Buses review of inner west and south
  2. Crave Sydney
  3. On board the clerkship

Tags: , , , , , ,

  1. Tommy Chen’s avatar

    The argu­ment put forth by the pro-​​metronites seems to be that it will be the trunk line on a future, expan­ded net­work. What think you of that?

    Reply

    1. Enoch Lau’s avatar

      That’s prob­ably the right approach to think of it, but it doesn’t neg­ate the need to prop­erly con­sider the design of the first line – once you’ve built it, you’re not going to rip it up. In par­tic­u­lar, it will be pro­hib­it­ively expens­ive to recon­fig­ure the sta­tions after it’s built to bring them closer together, in order to make the metro a par­tial bus replacement.

      Reply

  2. Tommy Chen’s avatar

    I get the feel­ing that the gov­ern­ment hasn’t prop­erly con­sidered what it’s build­ing and how it works with CityRail (though I haven’t read their report). It seems to be all polit­ic­ally motiv­ated to have *some­thing*. A top-​​down approach, not bottoms-​​up, start­ing from a prob­lem, as you poin­ted out.

    You have to start with “what is fun­da­ment­ally Sydney’s prob­lem” and then ask “what tools do we have” and “what prob­lems would each one solve”, and then match up the two.

    Of course prob­lems can be looked at at vari­ous levels of abstrac­tion (e.g. too many people liv­ing in the sub­urbs and work­ing in the city –> build more satel­lite towns or con­sol­id­ate res­id­en­tial areas into the city …)

    Reply

    1. Enoch Lau’s avatar

      There are some other devel­op­ments incom­pat­ible with the metro, such as the move by gov­ern­ment and busi­nesses out west (espe­cially to Par­ra­matta), which lowers the dens­ity of the CBD.

      Reply

  3. Dan’s avatar

    What is needed is a com­pre­hens­ive trans­port strategy (encom­passing rail/​bus/​ferry/​car etc…) but that is likely to piss off as many people as it delights, so it will never hap­pen. Hur­rah. We could at least alle­vi­ate the prob­lem by vest­ing plan­ning power for the Sydney met­ro­pol­itan area in a single body.

    Reply

    1. Enoch Lau’s avatar

      Rees could even do it on the the­ory that mer­ging gov­ern­ment depart­ments saves admin­is­trat­ive costs.

      Reply

  4. dean collins’s avatar

    lol, what makes you think we should listen to someone who cant even use the menu on their mobile phone to read QR codes.

    not judging, just point­ing out the obvi­ous :)

    Cheers,
    Dean

    Reply

    1. Enoch Lau’s avatar

      I can use the menu to find the QR reader. It’s just that it’s bur­ied deep within the menu struc­ture and abso­lutely clumsy to use once opened.

      Reply

  5. Jerry’s avatar

    I think the ori­ginal CBD rail line should be built rather than a metro line at the moment.

    Then built a heavy rail net­work that ser­vices only the sub­urbs (skip­ping the inner sub­urbs) and the main sub­urban and city sta­tions, with the inner sub­urbs ser­viced by a metro.

    Reply

  6. online stock trading advice’s avatar

    what a great site and inform­at­ive posts, I will add a back­link and book­mark your site. Keep up the good work!

    I’m Out! :)

    Reply