<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duration of copyright: companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/2009/05/05/duration-of-copyright-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/2009/05/05/duration-of-copyright-companies/</link>
	<description>Enoch Lau&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:05:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Enoch Lau</title>
		<link>http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/2009/05/05/duration-of-copyright-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-185139</link>
		<dc:creator>Enoch Lau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/?p=697#comment-185139</guid>
		<description>Copyright in original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works subsists for 70 years after the author&#039;s death, if the work is published before the author&#039;s death (s 33).

Copyright in a sound recording and cinematograph film subsists for 70 years after first publication (s 93-94).

Copyright in a television or sound broadcast subsists for 50 years after the broadcast (s 95).

Copyright in a published edition of a work subsists for 25 years after first publication (s 96).

Note the difference between a musical work and a sound recording of that musical work.

(For the precise wording, have a read of the Copyright Act itself.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Copyright in original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works subsists for 70 years after the author’s death, if the work is published before the author’s death (s 33).</p>
<p>Copyright in a sound recording and cinematograph film subsists for 70 years after first publication (s 93-94).</p>
<p>Copyright in a television or sound broadcast subsists for 50 years after the broadcast (s 95).</p>
<p>Copyright in a published edition of a work subsists for 25 years after first publication (s 96).</p>
<p>Note the difference between a musical work and a sound recording of that musical work.</p>
<p>(For the precise wording, have a read of the Copyright Act itself.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Kilburn</title>
		<link>http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/2009/05/05/duration-of-copyright-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-185129</link>
		<dc:creator>James Kilburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 06:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/?p=697#comment-185129</guid>
		<description>Does the same dur­a­tion of copy­right that applies to published works, apply to works such as written music or recorded music?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the same dur­a­tion of copy­right that applies to published works, apply to works such as written music or recorded music?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enoch Lau</title>
		<link>http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/2009/05/05/duration-of-copyright-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-158070</link>
		<dc:creator>Enoch Lau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 11:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/?p=697#comment-158070</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right - I confused the main Act with the amending Act</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re right – I confused the main Act with the amending Act</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Chen</title>
		<link>http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/2009/05/05/duration-of-copyright-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-158065</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 11:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nointrigue.com/blog/?p=697#comment-158065</guid>
		<description>If I recall correctly, the &quot;Mickey Mouse&quot; is a reference to the legislative origin of the rule - it was specifically extended because the copyright on Mickey Mouse owned by the Walt Disney Company was about to expire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I recall correctly, the “Mickey Mouse” is a reference to the legislative origin of the rule – it was specifically extended because the copyright on Mickey Mouse owned by the Walt Disney Company was about to expire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
