“If we do not destroy ourselves, we will one day venture to the stars…”
And who said science can’t give meaning to your life, and can’t imbue you with a sense of purpose?
Part of me still wishes I did that physics major.
You are currently browsing the archive for the Science category.
“If we do not destroy ourselves, we will one day venture to the stars…”
And who said science can’t give meaning to your life, and can’t imbue you with a sense of purpose?
Part of me still wishes I did that physics major.
The Hubble Space telescope is back in action after its servicing mission in May this year, producing even more spectacular images.
This semester, we’ve been taking a course called “Algorithmic Game Theory”, which is the broad area that my thesis topic belongs in. Although Tasos is the course coordinator, and lectured the first couple of lectures, the bulk of the “lecturing” has fallen to the students in the course.
Last week was my turn, and I did my talk on evolutionary game theory. I had been interested in that ever since I read Dawkin’s The Selfish Gene, where he makes use of evolutionary game theory, albeit in a non-mathematical way, to explain his ideas for the evolution of genes. In a nutshell, evolutionary game theory allows you look at the evolution of strategies/genes/behaviours in a large population of organisms. For example, can a mutant gene overtake an incumbent gene? See the link before for more information, or read my lecture slides: evolutionary.pptx, evolutionary.pdf.
Now, onto the second half of the post’s title: why I’d hesitate to use PowerPoint again. I’ll begin with a clarification: why I’d hesitate to use PowerPoint again where I need to use equations at all. (If you’re an OpenOffice fan and you’re beginning to smirk, here’s something to wipe your smirk off: OpenOffice Impress fails to impress me even more dramatically. Sorry.)
I’ve been using LaTeX with Beamer for my presentations this year, and I’ve had a good experience with it so far. Why did I use PowerPoint? Mainly because I haven’t used PowerPoint 2007 for any real purpose so far, and secondly, because I saw that Word 2007 had a new flashy equation editor that’s kind of nice. It was a bit of a disappointment for me when I had finished writing all the slides with no maths to find that PowerPoint somehow failed to inherit this. Back to old Equation Editor. I hate it, so I took to doing the equations in Word and then copying them over as pictures. The main problem with all this is that, for a mathematical presentation, equations should not be treated as pictures. PowerPoint and OpenOffice both lack the ability to insert equations as inline text, and that frustrates me to no end. Another minor little gripe is that there’s no in-built way to have navigation bars like you do in Beamer.
The shocking thing is that most lecturers in academia, such as the School of IT, continue to use PowerPoint even though the set of tools it provides for technical presentations is minimal. (If you’re doing a sales pitch with pie charts and dot points, it’s fine.) Unfortunately, this just means there’s little incentive for Microsoft to go and improve the tools for this important market segment.
Tags: academia, algorithms, beamer, coursework, evolution, game theory, latex, powerpoint, presentation, richard dawkins
Zachary, G. Showstopper! The Breakneck Race to Create Windows NT and the Next Generation at Microsoft.
If you’re into computing history, this is well worth a read. By the end, you get a really good sense of the personal sacrifices made to create the first version of Windows NT; it’s hard to criticise the flaws in Vista (which is for those unfamiliar with Windows versioning, NT 6.0) when you realise the price that many in the team paid: the loss of friends, and the shattering of relationships. At first, I found the digressions into personal history distracting, but I felt it added the necessary dimension to an otherwise technical topic.
I also finished reading Gittinomics by the one and only Ross Gittins, and Joel Spolsky’s ramblings on just about everything (not the actual title), even though I’ve read his web articles already. I admire Spolsky’s ability to make management and business accessible to a technical audience.
… and as usual I borrowed out a bunch of Cantonese books from Fisher, and this time, a book on expressive Japanese joined the mix. I’m now up to Dawkins #2, but this one seems much harder going than The Selfish Gene. On the left is a very dense book on convex mathematics from my supervisor. It’s dense.
Not so dense:
Tags: cantonese, doraemon, japanese, joel spolsky, microsoft, richard dawkins, ross gittins, software development, vista, windows
I don’t know why I didn’t think of this before, but to get around the fact that a lot of the online New Scientist is locked up for subscribers only, you can log into the university library’s website and go via one of the databases that has New Scientist. Some are an edition behind, but Factiva has the current one available… and although the formatting makes it a little hard to read, at least all the text is there.
Tags: library, new scientist
My Kodak LS743 gave up the ghost with the mysterious E45 error, which from what I can gather, is rather common on Kodak cameras. It had been showing the error just every now and then, but recently, every time I turned it on, it would display the error. It’s a pity, because for a consumer camera, I could hardly fault it.
From scouring the forums, it appears that the error is triggered by some particles being lodged in some sensor related to the lens. The Kodak site itself was unhelpful, simply suggesting that you take it in for servicing (expensive!). But some people have managed to recover their camera from the error – and judging that a massacred camera isn’t much worse than a non-functioning camera, I took to it with a screwdriver.
The result is illustrated down below. Try as I might, I couldn’t work out how to take the lens out for cleaning – there must be some screws I’ve missed. Surprisingly, it’s still bootable in that state – you just need to hold the battery in its slot because I’ve taken out the bit of plastic that holds it in. But no luck – still getting the error.
A bit of a waste of time, but interesting nonetheless. Trivia: when you take the back panel off, you can clearly see the Sharp branding on the LCD panel. Will we buy another Kodak? I’d recommend against them. All the Kodaks we’ve had have died in mysterious circumstances. I’d like to get another consumer camera one day – taking my SLR around is a little awkward sometimes.
Tags: camera, dissection, kodak
I’m reading Richard Dawkin’s The Selfish Gene at the moment, and I’m rather engrossed with it currently – I’m a sucker for pop sci. One thing I’ll have to say is that his style of argument has definitely reversed my previous opinion that biology is a fluffy field of study. I won’t say much more because there are people who are able to make far more capable commentaries about the work, but I will say that the use of game theory, a central theme in my honours work, in the study of evolution has opened my eyes to the wide applicability of game theoretic approaches.
Tags: evolution, game theory, richard dawkins
Recent Comments