Urban affairs

You are currently browsing the archive for the Urban affairs category.

Sydney Buses is con­duct­ing a review of the bus routes in the “inner west and south” – a fairly expans­ive region includ­ing Par­ra­matta Road and City Road ser­vices, and affect­ing ser­vices all the way to Lid­combe, Hurstville and Kog­arah. It’s not a drastic rethink of bus ser­vices in this region though; see the pro­posed map and the explan­at­ory bro­chure.

One notice­able change, how­ever, is the new Met­ro­bus Route 30 from Mos­man to Enmore via the CBD. I obvi­ously can’t take any credit for it, but I must say it looks rather like my pro­posed metro route that runs from New­town to Neut­ral Bay!

Another inter­est­ing point is that the bro­chure addresses the ques­tion of why mini-​​buses aren’t used – a good ques­tion, given that a one-​​size-​​fits-​​all approach, intu­it­ively at least, doesn’t make sense.

Tags: ,

What Would High-​​Speed Rail Do to Sub­urban Sprawl? It’s often impli­citly assumed that rail travel is bene­fi­cial in and of itself, but this New York Times blog post argues that the con­struc­tion of high-​​speed rail in the US — mooted as part of the stim­u­lus pro­gramme — could actu­ally foster urban sprawl.

19 Aug 2009 by Enoch Lau | No comments

Min­imal funds to fix Sydney con­ges­tion: no sur­prises here, but what will Sydney do? We can’t just sit here while Mel­bourne steams ahead. And what needs fix­ing about the Perth-​​Fremantle rail­way? When I was over there, I thought Transperth was almost a model of perfection…

13 May 2009 by Enoch Lau | No comments

NSW only gets $100m for the west metro, while Vic­toria is set to get $3.5bn for a metro rail tun­nel in Mel­bourne. Dis­ap­point­ing, but it’s hard to say the Vic­tori­ans don’t deserve it.

10 May 2009 by Enoch Lau | No comments

If there’s one thing that I’ve taken away from my IT stud­ies, it’s this: even if you come up with a new, whiz­bang idea, ask your­self, what prob­lem does it solve?

Many innov­at­ive people are prob­ably hav­ing many innov­at­ive ideas right now, but do any of these ideas solve real prob­lems that people care about?

As an example, my pet peeve are those bar­codes on posters that you’re meant to scan with your mobile phone. Tel­stra seems to think they’re a great idea, but really, what prob­lem does it solve? Is it that I can’t get enough advert­ising in my day that I need to access pro­mo­tional crap even faster? It doesn’t even save me time, and it’s not easier either. I tried it on a bus once: nav­ig­at­ing the menus on my Nokia and try­ing to get the cam­era (which (un)helpfully zoomed in to tele­scopic depths) to focus on a little square on the ceil­ing above my head got me nowhere except for stares all round.

Any­way, back to the main point for today. Firstly, I’d say met­ros are good. I like met­ros. Nathan Rees likes met­ros too.

But what prob­lem does the Central-​​Rozelle metro solve?

Accord­ing to the Her­ald today, the first three stops are Cent­ral, Town Hall and Mar­tin Place. We already have a train line that allows you con­vey your­self between those very three points. Then it con­tin­ues on to Rozelle. What on earth is at Rozelle? The idea is, it would be seem, to make people alight from Vic­toria Road buses and fin­ish the bal­ance of their jour­ney on the metro. Yes, Vic­toria Road is a park­ing lot dur­ing peak hour, but does this metro solve the prob­lem? If people aren’t catch­ing the buses right now, there’s no indic­a­tion that more people will be inclined to catch buses that con­nect onto a metro. Look at the map your­self: Vic­toria Road is a night­mare because it’s the free altern­at­ive to the Lane Cove Tun­nel and the Har­bour Bridge, for people up north-​​western way (Ryde, etc).

Then there’s the Cent­ral end. The idea is to make people get off CityRail trains and force them to change onto the metro… which runs to Town Hall, Mar­tin Place and Wynyard. Apart from the fact that those sta­tions can already be reached by people get­ting off at Cent­ral, what prob­lem is the metro solv­ing? It’s a little crowded at times, but it works reas­on­ably well, and the gov­ern­ment must have been think­ing that they could arti­fi­cially engin­eer a prob­lem by mak­ing every­one get off. It’s not going to work.

Spend­ing $5bn for a pat­ron­age of 5,500 people is pathetic. But people will come if you solve their problems.

So what prob­lems are there that could be solved by a metro? Buses. Sydney Buses suck. Espe­cially the ones that run along George and Cast­lereigh Streets. If you stand along George Street dur­ing peak hour, every second vehicle going past you is a bus. The Wynyard bus ter­minal is also a night­mare; office work­ers queuing up for miles to get on buses destined for the north­ern beaches, along with the Great Wall of China, are the two man-​​made form­a­tions vis­ible from space.

I’ve had this drawn up for a while, but this is a metro line, if it were built, that I think would solve prob­lems:


Enlarge this map

With this metro, you would ter­min­ate Par­ra­matta Road and City Road buses before Broad­way. In this case, for­cing people off won’t irk any­one because the ride into the city is cur­rently tor­ture any­way. Like­wise, on the north­ern approach, ter­min­ate north­ern beaches buses before they hit the bridge. I’ve only paired two sta­tions with CityRail sta­tions – Cent­ral and Wynyard (I think Town Hall is bey­ond hope) – and moved city sta­tions closer together. They’re fur­ther apart than bus stops, but frankly, bus stops on every block as it cur­rently stands is a bit ridicu­lous. Com­bined with some light rail on the sur­face, which Clover seems more than happy to provide, this, I humbly sub­mit, is a metro that solves the CBD’s problems.

It’s not that I think a metro can’t be a good solu­tion, but as it stands, the Central-​​Rozelle metro gets Sydney nowhere.

Tags: , , , , , ,

I don't think it's time for me to give up my day job yet.

Tags: , , ,

It appears that CityRail quietly changed the timetable without telling any­one. This week, I’ve caught a couple of out­bound trains along the Air­port & East Hills line that stop all sta­tions to Kings­grove and then East Hills. I thought they took an all sta­tions to East Hills ser­vice and cut out all the sta­tions in between, but look­ing at the timetable, I now real­ise they’ve taken the ser­vices that are sup­posed to ter­min­ate at Kings­grove and exten­ded them to East Hills. The first one is at 8:23pm at Cent­ral and then every half hour until 10:23pm. The time taken from Kings­grove to East Hills non-​​stop is just over 10 minutes.

The strangest thing is that they haven’t made any announce­ments at all, not on the web and not on notice­boards at sta­tions either.

Tags:

Red­fern. The name prob­ably evokes memory of the 2004 Red­fern riots and the Abori­ginal enclave in the Block. As with other uni stu­dents who use Red­fern sta­tion, I’m fairly famil­iar with the part to the west of the sta­tion. But what lies to the east? With a cam­era, I set out to investigate.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , ,

A while back, CityRail star­ted hav­ing these Empty Trains. I can’t for the life of me work out why any­one would choose such a stu­pid name. Does it mean that there’s no one inside? Does it mean it doesn’t go any­where after­wards, as in, it’s ter­min­at­ing? (If so, what’s wrong with the word ter­min­at­ing?) I sup­pose it’s bet­ter than a (null) train.

The real WTF in the pic­ture, though, is how a plat­form 23 ser­vice ended up on the Illawarra Line screen.

Tags: ,

Ah yes, The Mind Gap.

Tags: ,

« Older entries